A case against the Green Climate Fund’s concurrent 50:50 ratio climate change mitigation and adaptation strategy


Journal article


M. I. Espinoza, S. R. Brechin
Climatic Change, vol. 142(311–320), 2017


Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Espinoza, M. I., & Brechin, S. R. (2017). A case against the Green Climate Fund’s concurrent 50:50 ratio climate change mitigation and adaptation strategy. Climatic Change, 142(311–320). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1938-8


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Espinoza, M. I., and S. R. Brechin. “A Case against the Green Climate Fund’s Concurrent 50:50 Ratio Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Strategy.” Climatic Change 142, no. 311–320 (2017).


MLA   Click to copy
Espinoza, M. I., and S. R. Brechin. “A Case against the Green Climate Fund’s Concurrent 50:50 Ratio Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Strategy.” Climatic Change, vol. 142, no. 311–320, 2017, doi:10.1007/s10584-017-1938-8.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{espinoza2017a,
  title = {A case against the Green Climate Fund’s concurrent 50:50 ratio climate change mitigation and adaptation strategy},
  year = {2017},
  issue = {311–320},
  journal = {Climatic Change},
  volume = {142},
  doi = {10.1007/s10584-017-1938-8},
  author = {Espinoza, M. I. and Brechin, S. R.}
}